SaaS Development
Multi-tenant products with authentication, billing, dashboards and APIs — architected so growth does not force a rewrite.
What’s included
Industries
Learning platforms and school operations that hold up when everyone logs in at the same time.
Systems we integrate with
Moodle · Zoom · Stripe · Google Workspace · Microsoft Teams · Payme / Click
Schools, universities and training centres tend to have more software than they need and less integration than they need. Admissions is in one place, timetabling in another, attendance on paper, fee collection in accounting, and parent communication on WhatsApp. Each was bought to solve a real problem, and together they create the work of keeping five systems agreeing about the same student.
The builds that pay for themselves here are usually the connecting ones. A single student record that admissions, attendance, assessment and finance all reference. Enrolment that flows from application to timetable to invoice without re-entry. Fee schedules with instalments, discounts and sibling rules that finance can actually reconcile. And parent communication that is a feature of the system rather than a staff member's phone.
For training centres and course providers the shape is different but the principle holds: the cohort is the unit, and enrolment, scheduling, attendance, certification and payment should be views of one record. Where a learning platform already works, we integrate rather than replace — the value is almost never in rebuilding course delivery.
Multi-tenant products with authentication, billing, dashboards and APIs — architected so growth does not force a rewrite.
What’s included
Corporate sites, landing pages and web applications that load fast, rank well and turn traffic into enquiries.
What’s included
Customer apps, field-team apps and internal tools, built once and shipped to both stores with the same team.
What’s included
Research, product flows, design systems and prototypes — designed for the build, not just for the pitch deck.
What’s included
Frequently asked questions
Usually not. Most of the pain in education software is between systems rather than inside any one of them, so an integration and a shared student record generally deliver more than a replacement for less money and less disruption. We recommend replacing only when the existing system cannot export its own data in a usable form, which does happen and is worth discovering early.
Yes, and the complexity is in the rules rather than the payment. Instalment schedules, sibling discounts, scholarships, partial payments and late fees have to produce a balance that both the parent and your finance team agree on. We model those explicitly, keep a ledger rather than a running total, and integrate with the local payment methods parents actually use.
Minimised at collection, scoped by role so a teacher sees their own classes rather than the whole school, logged on access, and hosted in the region you choose inside your own accounts. Records about minors deserve stricter defaults than adult data, so retention and deletion are decided during design rather than left to a policy document written afterwards. We build to your regulator's and counsel's requirements and do not offer compliance opinions of our own.
Attendance, yes, and it is usually straightforward once the student record is shared. Timetabling is worth a direct answer: automatic generation against complex constraints is a genuinely hard optimisation problem, and if you already run a specialist timetabling tool the sensible project is to integrate with it. We build timetabling ourselves where the constraints are moderate, and we will tell you which case you are in rather than discovering it mid-project.
Next step
Tell us what you are trying to achieve. You will get a considered reply from an engineer — not a sales script.
We reply to project enquiries within one business day.