Retail & E-commerce

Yes, and it is usually the whole point of the project. The design question is not whether to share stock but how to handle the edge: a simultaneous till sale and web order, a reservation held for an unpaid order, stock in transit between branches. We make those rules explicit and visible rather than leaving them to be discovered during a busy weekend.

Often not. If the POS is reliable at the till and exposes an API or a usable export, the better project is an integration and a shared stock layer around it. We recommend replacing a POS when it cannot expose stock movements at all, or when the licence cost is scaling faster than a build would — and we will tell you when the honest answer is that your current setup is fine.

Whichever ones your customers already use, which is a market question rather than a technical one. mada in Saudi Arabia, local cards and wallets in the UAE, Payme, Click and Uzum in Uzbekistan, cards and instalment options elsewhere. An international-card-only checkout quietly loses a large share of customers in several of our markets, and the loss looks like weak demand rather than a broken payment step.

Yes, and for a lot of retailers it is the right answer. Shopify plus a well-built integration layer costs less and ships sooner than a custom storefront, and we will say so when it fits. Custom becomes worth it when your pricing, stock or fulfilment rules cannot be expressed in the platform without fighting it — B2B pricing tiers and complex multi-branch fulfilment are the usual triggers.